Jury Nullification Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

board Nullification - Case Study Examplev. Morgentalers study whereby the nominated practice of law did not adequately turn over (R. v. Morgentaler, 1988). However, this has always been the norm due to the de f propelo power granted to juries whereby despite judges role of instructing and advising them to act based on the law in question cannot interfere with their final verdicts. For instance, in R. v. Morgentalers showcase the accused were acquitted after the board found s.251, which they argued violated womens privileges was true and did not in anyway seem to hold them accountable for their actions. In most cases, jury nullification as obvious in the case aforementioned prompt some individuals especially those who bedevil done grievous crimes take their arbitration because they are aware of receiving fair judgments incomparable to the magnitude of their charges or all together acquitted. This is spare in R. v. Morgentalers case though the involved parties did not promp t the same but owe to then unfolding circumstances about laws interlingual rendition disregarded the charges, hence acquitting the accused (R. v. Morgentaler, 1988). Acquittal occurs if jury finds the stated law inapplicable, oppressive as well as unpopular based on their interpretation and other aspects that may influence their irrevocable verdicts them like morality. For instance, in R. v. ... What do you think of jury nullification? Despite numerous negative responses anti jury nullification, I think its role is more of upholding the capital punishment of nicety with consideration of morality. However, this in many incidences may differ with both judge and claimants anticipations concerning varied laws, which they cite the accused might have infringed based on the case at hand. Since, in all their undertakings and verdicts juries agnise certain fundamental considerations whose core purpose is to ensure fair trial of all parties involved in the case. However, due to their cont rary verdicts to those of the involved parties may seem either unwise or favoring a particular party/side. This is especially evident when the jury nullifies a law that renders one guilty of having violated whereby with the assistance of their interpretation pronounce it being conflicting. Hence, the accused acquitted for having done wrong as in the R. v. Morgentaler case where the claimant was very sure the specialists were quilt. However, the case overturned when the specialists cited s.251 violated womens rights by compelling them to carry to condition fetus that may in process subject them to both emotional and psychological distress (R. v. Morgentaler, 1988). This is upholding of morality, justice and vulnerable peoples rights as well as protecting those who may not have adequate knowledge concerning interpretation of a certain laws. However, with the intervention of jury the accused end up getting fair judgment or acquitted if the law is oppressive or unpopular as in the ca se R. v. Morgentaler where the prosecutions side ended up using another law to defend the cited infringed law (R. v. Morgentaler, 1988). Based on my opinion, this does not imply judges compared to juries are